LinkedIn has baffled me over the years. I found the public resume format with so many intricate details quite odd, especially when I wasn’t job hunting.
However, its presence and uptick in use among professionals and employers have solidified its credibility. I’ve caught myself researching people online (e.g., those applying for a position), and if a well-constructed LinkedIn profile surfaces, I trust them a bit more.
That’s one of the many powers behind social media tools. By having a presence on a robotically-algorithmic site, it can spark an emotional response: “Oh, thank goodness she has a photo!”
While I’ve been a member of LinkedIn for years, I’ve seriously neglected my activity there. About every six months, I’ll log in and find 300+ people trying to “get in my
belly network!” I usually can recall an interaction with about 65%. The rest is a guessing game.
But since I’m a textbook Leo, the more, the merrier!
Further, I did some profile pruning recently and am finally happy with the layout. I moved volunteer board positions to another section, “Organizations,” which has kept my day-to-day work history crisp.
Even though I haven’t listed five bullet points for each title, I did include one summary sentence of my work. It’s not the kitchen sink. It’s not a resume. But it should provide a telling glimpse for friends, colleagues, nosey competitors, and unknowns to understand my scope.
I write this as a testament for fellow skeptics to revisit an old site with the mindset that you don’t have to conform to rules or guidelines that modern-day Emily Posts preach.
Just try what works for you. If it doesn’t, there are thousands of other sites awaiting your mastery.